IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, IDUKKI, PAINAVU, KUYILIMALA – Appellant
Versus
SRI.MADHUSOODHANA KAIMAL, S/O.DAMODHARA KAIMAL – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[LA.App. Nos.278/2022, 373/2022, 379/2022, 429/2022, 433/2022, 440/2022, 469/2022, 485/2022, 486/2022]
These appeals have been filed by the State aggrieved by the judgments and decrees passed by Sub Court, Thodupuzha in various Land Acquisition References. The properties involved in these cases were acquired pursuant to a notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act on 03.03.2010 for the purpose of widening of Thodupuzha – Ramamangalam Road (Reach 2). Dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, the respondents approached the Sub Court, Thodupuzha. The learned Sub Judge fixed the value of the property on the basis of the land value fixed in LAR 83/2014. The judgment in LAR No.83 of 2014 was set aside by this Court in an appeal filed against the same by the Government. The matter was remitted to the Reference Court for the reason that the Reference Court had relied on a post notification transaction to fix the market value of the property.
` 2. Though notice was issued to the respondents they have not entered appearance.
3. Heard the learned Senior Government Pleader and perused the impugned judgments and decrees as well
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.