IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
RAMASWAMY S/O. NONJAN @ CHINNANIKAN – Appellant
Versus
PAZHANIYAMMAL W/O. MOHANAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case and procedural history (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments surrounding the appeal and objections (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. court's observations and assessment of the findings (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. ratio decidendi determining the issues presented (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
In a suit for injunction, the 1st appellant/plaintiff has been non-suited concurrently by the Courts below. The 1st appellant/plaintiff instituted the suit for injunction against his own sister stating that an attempt was made by the sister to destroy the paddy cultivation carried out by the plaintiff over the plaint schedule property which consists of 60 cents in Sy. No. 1016, 21 cents in Sy. No. 1017 and 35 cents in Sy. No. 1013, totalling to 1 Acre 16 cents situated in Paramanchalla in Valiyavallampathy village in Chittur Taluk, Palakkad district.
1.1. The plaintiff traced out his possession from one Subbayya Pillai under whom he claims that he had taken possession 48 years ago. The respondent/defendant on the other hand disputed the identity of the property and contended that the property over which the plaintiff was claiming right belonged to their father Chinna Naicken who took it under a verum pattam l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.