Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14629
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
M.D.GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
M.K.RAJAN – Respondent
AS NO. 466 OF 2001
Important Points
A compromise between parties can lead to the disposal of an appeal and entitlement to court fee refund.
Subject
Civil - Civil Procedure
Headnote
The appellant filed a compromise petition to record the settlement between the parties, leading to the disposal of the appeal (I.A No.2 of 2026). The court recognized that the matter has been settled, ordering a refund of the court fee. Pending applications were closed.
Result: The appeal disposed of as settled.
Result: The appeal disposed of as settled.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. P.B.KRISHNAN (SR.), SRI. P.M.NEELAKANDAN, SRI. S.NITHIN (ANCHAL), SRI. SABU GEORGE, SRI. P.B.SUBRAMANYAN
For the Respondents: SRI. ASHIK K.MOHAMED ALI, SRI. PEEYUS A.KOTTAM, SRI. HAROON ASHRAF, SRI. MOHAMMAD ISHAAQ, SRI. AMJATH T.H., SRI. MOHAMMED ISHAQUE.T.T, SRI. AHZAMIN SHANAVAS
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. P.B.KRISHNAN (SR.), SRI. P.M.NEELAKANDAN, SRI. S.NITHIN (ANCHAL), SRI. SABU GEORGE, SRI. P.B.SUBRAMANYAN
For the Respondents: SRI. ASHIK K.MOHAMED ALI, SRI. PEEYUS A.KOTTAM, SRI. HAROON ASHRAF, SRI. MOHAMMAD ISHAAQ, SRI. AMJATH T.H., SRI. MOHAMMED ISHAQUE.T.T, SRI. AHZAMIN SHANAVAS
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement between parties through compromise. (Para 1) |
| 2. court ordered closure of matters post-settlement. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
A compromise petition is filed by the appellant to record the compromise between the parties.
2. In the light of the compromise petition filed in I.A No.2 of 2026, the R.F.A stands disposed of and the compromise petition shall form part of the judgment. Since the matter has been settled between the parties, the appellant will be entitled for refund of the court fee paid. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand closed.
The Registry may refund the court fee on usual terms.
Sd/-
