Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
M.D.GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
M.K.RAJAN – Respondent
AS NO. 466 OF 2001
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement between parties through compromise. (Para 1) |
| 2. court ordered closure of matters post-settlement. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
A compromise petition is filed by the appellant to record the compromise between the parties.
2. In the light of the compromise petition filed in I.A No.2 of 2026, the R.F.A stands disposed of and the compromise petition shall form part of the judgment. Since the matter has been settled between the parties, the appellant will be entitled for refund of the court fee paid. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand closed.
The Registry may refund the court fee on usual terms.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
