SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14675

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
MOHAMMED SHAJI S. – Appellant
Versus
THE CORPORATION OF COCHIN – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 48636 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: DR.V.N.SANKARJEE, SRI.SAKIR.K.H., SMT. KEERTHI B. CHANDRAN, SHRI.VIJAYAN PILLAI P.K., SMT.SHILPA P.S., SHRI.UNNIKRISHNAN H., SHRI.ASWIN P.S., SMT.SHRIYA MERLIN MAXWELL
For the Respondents: SHRI.D.G.VIPIN

Property tax assessment must comply with the revised statutory framework, emphasizing plinth area over annual rental value.

Headnote:This judgment addresses the assessment of property tax under Sec. 233 of the Kerala Municipality Act, as amended in 2014. The petitioners contested their property's tax calculation based on annual rental value rather than plinth area, arguing for revision based on a prior court ruling. The Court agreed, directing the tax calculation to consider the plinth area post-amendment. The underlying issues including statutory interpretation and precedential authority were pivotal to the ruling. Consequently, the Court quashed the earlier assessment order and mandated a reassessment based on the requested criteria.

Table of Content
1. assessment method for property tax must align with statutory requirements. (Para 1)
2. court supports revision of tax assessment in line with previous judgments. (Para 2)

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are aggrieved by the rejection of the request submitted by them, for revising the property tax based on the plinth area. The property tax for the petitioners’ building was assessed on the basis of annual rental value, which according to the petitioners, is higher than the rate as per rate to be fixed based on the plinth area. As per Sec.233 of the Kerala Municipality Act , as amended in the year 2014, the tax has to be assessed based on the plinth area and not on the annual rental value. Since the assessment of tax of the petitioners’ property was based on annual rental value, the application for revision of property tax was submitted but the same was rejected as per Ext.P5. The petitioners rely on Ext.P7 judgment, wherein this Court ordered to consider the revision of tax based on plinth area for the period after 2014, in similar circumstances.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel for the respondents, I am of the view that, a similar direction can be issued in this case as well, by interfering with Ext.P5 order.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of quashing Ext.P5, with a direction to the respondents to refix the property tax payable by the petitioners in respect of their building based on plinth area for the period after the amendment was brought to Section 233 of the Kerala Municipality Act . The same shall be done after hearing the petitioners.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top