IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
M/S. SREEDHANYA DEVELOPERS & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 20th day of February, 2026)
The petitioner Company acquired 38.62 ares of property in Kudappanakunnu Village through an e-auction conducted by M/s. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd., following the 2nd respondent’s loan default. Indiabulls held a prior equitable mortgage created when the property was unencumbered. However, the property is now subject to an attachment order (Ext.P4) for Rs.12,24,44,314/- initiated by the 1st respondent. The petitioner claims priority of the secured creditor under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act and Section 31B of the RDBFI Act , contending that the attachment is non-binding and prevents registration and mutation of the property. The petitioner filed this writ petition for the following reliefs: i. To issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ or order quashing Exhibit P4 proceedings of the 3rd respondent to the extent imposing a charge, attachment or restriction in alienation of the property having an extent of 38.62 Ares in Re-Survey Nos. 447/16-1, 447/15, 447/24, 447/14, 447/10, 448/15, 447/30, 447/17 and 448/28 of Kudappanakunnu Village detailed in Exhibit P1 sale certificate.
ii. To issue a writ in the natur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.