IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SENTHILKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1196 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.222/2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the applicant is charged with possession of explosive substances. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. the court grants bail considering lack of necessity for continued detention. (Para 4) |
| 3. the defense asserts innocence, arguing lack of evidence. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.222/2026 of Town South Police Station, Palakkad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 118 (f) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011 , Section 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 9(B)(1)(b) of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 .
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 04.02.2026 at 20.15 hours, at Kadamkode Service Road, the applicant with the knowledge of possessing explosive substance carried 18000 gelatin sticks and 4800 non electric detonators in his vehicle bearing No.TN-90-H-3740. The said explosive substances were illegally possessed and transported without any license under suspicious circumstances and thereby committed the offences.
4. I have heard Sri.V.A.Johnson, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.
6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on
05.02.2026. The investigation is almost over. The recovery has been effected. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -
(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.
(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.
(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.
(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.
(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation. (vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.
(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.
Sd/-
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE
SKP
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.