SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14732

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
PRAVEEN @ PASSION KANNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1200 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.54/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.Abhiram P.P.
For the Respondents: Smt.Sreeja V., SR. PP

Insufficient evidence and custody duration justified granting bail under specific conditions.

Headnote:This bail application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking bail for the accused in Crime No.54/2026. The prosecution alleges wrongful restraint and assault on the de facto complainant by the applicant. The court found that there was insufficient evidence connecting the applicant to the crime, and after considering custody time, granted bail with specific conditions. The court's primary concerns were the applicant's ongoing cooperation with the investigation and restrictions on contact with prosecution witnesses. The court allowed the bail application subject to conditions set forth.

Table of Content
1. overview of bail application and allegations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by both counsel. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.54/2026 of Mala Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115(2), 117 (2) and 110 r/w Section 3 (5) of BNS.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 13.01.2026 at

7:45 a.m., while the de facto complainant was driving a tipper lorry, the applicant along with accused No.2 in furtherance of their common intention, due to enmity towards him, wrongfully restrained the de facto complainant by intercepting the lorry with a scooter, assaulted him, caused injuries and thereby committed the offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Abhiram P.P., the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. Sreeja V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on

13.01.2026. The investigation is almost over. The applicant has not used any weapon. It is true that the applicant has criminal antecedents. However, considering the fact that he has been in custody for more than one month and he has not used any weapon, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders.

He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top