Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
AGNEY PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the application was filed under the bnss, with specific allegations outlined. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments were presented concerning the innocence of the applicant and the claims of the prosecution. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.2/2026 of Cyber Crime Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 318 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 .
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant with an intention to cheat the defacto complainant contacted him through WhatsApp number, added him in a group named Nirmal Bang Securities Private Limited for primary trading in the market by using a link, made the defacto complainant to install an App and from 03.11.2025 to 09.01.2026, appropriated Rs.78,22,010/- from the HDFC Bank account of the defacto complainant at Delhi and thereby committed the offences. 4. I have heard Smt.Dhanya P. Ashokan, the learned Senior Counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
