SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14733

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
AGNEY PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1303 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.2/2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.R.VENUGOPAL, SMT.DHANYA P.ASHOKAN (SR.), SRI.S. MUHAMMAD ALIKHAN, SMT.ANJANA S. RAJ, SMT.GAYATHRI VENUGOPAL, SMT.A. A. AKHILA SREE PARVATHY
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C. ASHI, SR. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

A defendant can be granted bail if the prosecution fails to prove the necessity of continued detention, considering lack of prior criminal records and nearing completion of investigation.

Headnote:This application addresses the legalities pertaining to bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, where the applicant is accused in a cyber crime incident involving fraud. The court observed that the prosecution failed to establish a strong connection between the applicant and the crime, recommending bail due to lack of criminal antecedents and the completion of investigation. The primary issues were whether the applicant's release under the given conditions was justified and whether the alleged offenses warrant continued custody. The court concluded that the applicant is entitled to bail subject to conditions guarding against further offenses and ensuring cooperation with the investigation.

Table of Content
1. the application was filed under the bnss, with specific allegations outlined. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments were presented concerning the innocence of the applicant and the claims of the prosecution. (Para 5)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.2/2026 of Cyber Crime Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 318 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant with an intention to cheat the defacto complainant contacted him through WhatsApp number, added him in a group named Nirmal Bang Securities Private Limited for primary trading in the market by using a link, made the defacto complainant to install an App and from 03.11.2025 to 09.01.2026, appropriated Rs.78,22,010/- from the HDFC Bank account of the defacto complainant at Delhi and thereby committed the offences. 4. I have heard Smt.Dhanya P. Ashokan, the learned Senior Counsel for the applicant and Sri.M.C.Ashi, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on

30.01.2026. The investigation is almost over. Accused No.2 was arrested and already released on bail. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation. (vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top