Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
BASHEER, S/O ABDUL KAREEM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. concurrent findings of conviction in dacoity case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. amicus curiae appointed for representation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. evidence supports conviction by lower courts. (Para 6) |
| 4. final dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 7 , 8) |
O R D E R
The concurrent findings of conviction and sentence under Section
395 I.P.C, of the Principal Assistant Sessions Court, Ernakulam and the Sessions Court, Ernakulam, in S.C No.285/2000 and Crl.A No.501/2002 respectively, upon the accused Nos.4 and 5 in that case, are under challenge in this revision petition.
2. The prosecution case is that on 20.05.2000 at about 11:30 a.m, the petitioners herein, along with accused Nos.1 to 3, committed dacoity by robbing at knife point, an amount of Rs.50,000/- which PW1 was carrying in a bag, while standing at the bus stop waiting shed on the eastern side of the Ernakulam Maharaja’s College ground.
3. In the trial before the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Court, the prosecution examined nine witnesses as PW1 to PW9, and brought on record 8 documents as Exts.P1 to P8. Four material objects were identified and marked as MO1 to MO4. After analysing the aforesaid evidence, the Trial C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
