IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SUBASH K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 1155 OF 2026 | CRIME NO.715/2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of charges and bail request. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court’s decision regarding the bail application. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments regarding bail and prosecution evidence. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS ), seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the accused No.2 in Crime No.715/2025 of Nenmara Police Station, Palakkad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 .
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant procured 2.010 kilograms of ganja from the accused No.1 from Odisha, where he went and the accused No.3 joined him there and in furtherance of their conspiracy, brought it to Kerala in a rented car, after placing a fake registration number plate on it, namely, TN 30 1BJ9858 in the place of its original registration number OD 05 AW 8104, on the night of 19.10.2025, dashed away at Govindapuram check post, overlooking the signal given by the police officials headed by the detecting officer and thereafter, ran away from the car from a petrol pump by the side of Kollangode-Nenmara public road, when the detecting officer and his party approached, in which the accused No.1 alone could be caught and thereby committed the offences.
4. I have heard Sri.Renjish S. Menon, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.
6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on
25.10.2025. The investigation is almost over and the final report has already been filed. It is true that the applicant is involved in three other crimes of similar nature. However, the quantity involved in all those cases is small quantity. Hence, they are bailable in nature. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -
(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.
(ii) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.
(iii) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation. (iv) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.
(v) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.