COMMON JUDGMENT

W.P.(C)No.27283 of 2022

“i) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction, quashing Ext. P7 order issued by the 1^st respondent dated 08.08.2022;

iii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the properties covered by Exts.P6 & P6(a) documents by the petitioners”.

2.1. Subsequently the 1^st petitioner received a notice in the year 2015 from the 1^st respondent for hearing scheduled on 09.09.2015. The 1^st petitioner appeared before the 1^st respondent and explained that there was no attempt to destroy the trees, since shade is necessary, and there was no change in the cultivation of cardamom, and also, there was no violation of the lease. He further informed the 1^st respondent that the 2^nd petitioner is a co-owner of a property who has not received any notice from the 1^st respondent. Thereafter, petitioners 1 and 2 assigned their right over the properties in favour of petitioners 3 and