Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14863

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
JEROME THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
THE CANARA BANK – Respondent
OP (DRT) NO. 97 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SHERRY J. THOMAS, SRI.RENISH RAVEENDRAN, SRI.JOEMON ANTONY, SMT.ANJANA P.V.
For the Respondents: SRI. M. GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC

The court affirmed the right to withdraw a petition in debt recovery proceedings under applicable rules and regulations.

Headnote:The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the OP (DRT), which the court granted. The OP (DRT) is dismissed as withdrawn, emphasizing the court's authority in permitting withdrawal as per procedural norms.

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 27^th day of February, 2026)

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the OP(DRT). The permission sought for is granted.

The OP(DRT) is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14863

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBASANT BALAJI, JJEROME THOMAS – AppellantVersusTHE CANARA BANK – RespondentOP (DRT) NO. 97 OF 2026

The court affirmed the right to withdraw a petition in debt recovery proceedings under applicable rules and regulations.

Headnote:The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the OP (DRT), which the court granted. The OP (DRT) is dismissed as withdrawn, emphasizing the court's authority in permitting withdrawal as per procedural norms.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
JEROME THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
THE CANARA BANK – Respondent
OP (DRT) NO. 97 OF 2026