Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14875

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
SHEELA.N – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35466 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.K.BABU, SHRI.SHAJI P.K.
For the Respondents: SHRI.JITHESH MENON, SC, SBI, SHRI.TOM K.THOMAS

A writ petition can be dismissed as infructuous if the circumstances necessitating the petition have changed.

Headnote:The writ petition concerns issues of civil rights under statutory regulations. The petitioner submits that the case has become infructuous, leading the Court to determine the matter's current relevance. The Court ultimately dismisses the writ petition as infructuous, confirming the petitioner's assertion.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 27^th day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition (Civil) has become infructuous.

Recording the above submission, the writ petition (Civil)

is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14875

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBASANT BALAJI, JSHEELA.N – AppellantVersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 35466 OF 2022

A writ petition can be dismissed as infructuous if the circumstances necessitating the petition have changed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
SHEELA.N – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35466 OF 2022