SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14883

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
UNNIKRISHNAN.P.K. – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 4996 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM, SMT.EMIL HANNA THOMAS
For the Respondents: RAJEEV JYOTISH GEORGE, GP, SHRI.RAFEEK. V.K., SRI.SURAJ.S

A petitioner cannot seek police protection for quarrying operations without a valid permit.

Headnote:The writ petition sought directions for adequate protection in conducting a vibration test and quarrying operations (Paragraph 1). The court found the petitioner ineligible for protection due to an expired permit (Paragraphs 2 and 3). The conclusion indicated the case was closed while allowing future remedies upon renewal (Paragraph 3).

Table of Content
1. seeking protection for quarrying operations requires a valid permit. (Para 1)
2. a court observation regarding police protection in the absence of a valid permit. (Para 2)
3. court ruling allows future legal remedies upon renewal of permits. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to provide adequate protection to conduct a vibration test and protection to the petitioner and his workers to conduct quarrying operations in Re-Survey No.75/4 of Pariyiri Village, without any obstruction from the third respondent and his men.

2. When the writ petition came up for consideration earlier, this Court had, on 21.02.2025, granted an interim order directing adequate police protection to be granted for conducting the vibration test as mentioned in Ext.P10 stop memo. Subsequently, on 16.01.2026, an interim order was granted affording adequate and effective police protection to the petitioner to conduct quarrying operations without any obstruction as long as he held a valid licence. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents that the permit issued to the petitioner to conduct the quarrying operation expired by 17.01.2026 and thereafter the same has not been renewed.

3. Since the petitioner is not entitled to conduct quarrying operations without possessing a valid quarrying lease or a permit and it is submitted that his quarrying permit has expired, the petitioner cannot be protected with an order of police protection.

Accordingly, this writ petition is closed, reserving the liberty of the petitioner to seek appropriate remedies as and when a fresh permit or lease is obtained or renewed.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top