SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14892

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
SAHEEN M. – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD. – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2122 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SHRI.SUNIL SHANKER, SMT.VIDYA GANGADHARAN, SHRI.THOMAS GLAISON

The Court confirmed that a borrower must repay their dues on time to avoid coercive recovery actions, emphasizing a structured installment plan.

Headnote:In the matter of WP

(C) No. 2122 of 2026, proceedings were initiated under the SARFAESI Act for non-payment of loan by the petitioner, who was ordered to pay the overdue amount in installments. The Court noted the lender's willingness to regularize the loan, stating, 'The petitioner shall remit the overdue amount...in six equated monthly installments...' The outcome was that all coercive actions would be held in abeyance to facilitate repayment.

Table of Content
1. non-repayment of loan leads to sarfaesi proceedings. (Para 1 , 2)
2. bank expresses willingness to regularize the loan. (Para 3)
3. court outlines repayment schedule and maintains coercive actions in abeyance. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026)

The petitioner along with this wife availed a loan from the

3rd respondent bank. Due to non-repayment of the loan amount, the respondent initiated proceedings under the SARFAESI Act , 2002, by issuing Ext.P1 notice dated 18.12.2025. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this writ petition.

2. On 20.01.2026, this Court granted an interim order deferring the coercive steps against the petitioner, on condition that the petitioner shall remit an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- within one month. It is submitted that the petitioner has remitted Rs.95,000/-.

3. The learned Standing Counsel for the Bank, on instructions, submits that the overdue amount as on date is Rs.2,48,537/- and the Bank has no objection in regularizing the loan account.

4. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, and taking note of the fact that the Bank is proposing to take physical possession of the property and since the Bank has no objection in regularizing the loan account, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with the following directions:

a) The petitioner shall remit the overdue amount of Rs.2,48,537/- (Rupees two lakhs forty eight thousand five hundred and thirty seven only) together with any accrued interest, cost and allied charges, in six (6) equated monthly installments, starting from 20.04.2026 and the subsequent installments shall be paid on or before 20th of every succeeding months.

b) The petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMIs/installments along with the installments as directed above.

c) In the event of default of any one installment, the respondent Bank shall be entitled to proceed for recovery, in accordance with law.

d) All coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amount as directed above.

BASANT BALAJI JUDGE

ncd

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top