SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14894

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
REJI THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 5004 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BIJU .C. ABRAHAM, SHRI.THOMAS C.ABRAHAM
For the Respondents: SHRI.SUNIL SHANKER, SMT.VIDYA GANGADHARAN, SHRI.THOMAS GLAISON, SHRI.ASHLIN SAJU

Court mandated structured repayment of overdue loan amount, balancing rights of debtor and lender.

Headnote:The case pertains to a writ petition concerning a mortgage loan availed by the petitioner from the Indian Overseas Bank, leading to proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The court directed the petitioner to repay the overdue amount in installments and kept coercive proceedings in abeyance. The main issues revolve around the legality of the bank's actions and the petitioner's repayment obligations. The court emphasized the necessity of regularizing the loan account and the implications of default on installments. The petitioner is to remit the overdue amount in six installments, commencing March 20, 2026, with further conditions on default.

Table of Content
1. details of mortgage loan and default initiation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. repayment structure and conditions set by court. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 26th day of February, 2026)

The petitioner availed a mortgage loan of Rs.17 lakhs from the respondent bank. Due to non-repayment of the loan amount, the respondent initiated proceedings under the SARFAESI Act , 2002, by issuing Ext.P1 notice dated 23.10.2025 followed by Ext.P4 notice dated 03.02.2026.

Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed this writ petition. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the Bank, on instructions, submits that the overdue amount as on date is Rs.1,29,935/-. The Bank has no objection in regularizing the loan account.

3. Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, and taking note of the fact that the Bank is proposing to take physical possession of the property and since the Bank has no objection in regularizing the loan account, I deem it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with the following directions:

a) The petitioner shall remit the overdue amount of Rs.1,29,935/- (Rupees one lakh twenty nine thousand nine hundred and thirty five only) together with any accrued interest, cost and allied charges, in six (6) equated monthly installments, starting from 20.03.2026 and the subsequent installments shall be paid on or before 20th of every succeeding months.

b) The petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMIs/installments along with the installments as directed above.

c) In the event of default of any one installment, the respondent Bank shall be entitled to proceed for recovery, in accordance with law.

d) All coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amount as directed above.

Sd/-

BASANT BALAJI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top