SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14901

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
RAMABHAYI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 845 OF 2022 | CRIME NO.829/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.JOHN K.GEORGE, SRI.M.A.PRABHU
For the Respondents: SMT. BINDU.O.V

The court affirmed that prima facie evidence suffices to proceed with charges under established statutes regarding atrocities against scheduled caste members.

Headnote:The petitioners, accused in a criminal case, sought to quash proceedings against them under Sections 341, 506 r/w 34 IPC, and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR accused them of insulting and intimidating a member of a scheduled caste community. The court found prima facie evidence of the alleged offenses, dismissing the petition to quash proceedings.

Result: 'This Crl.M.C. is dismissed.'

Table of Content
1. circumstances surrounding the alleged offenses. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 3)
3. court's findings on the evidence presented. (Para 4)

ORDER

Dated this the 25th day of February, 2026 The accused Nos. 1 to 3 in Crime No. 829 of 2020 of Thrikkunnappuzha police station has filed this Crl.M.C. under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., praying for quashing all further proceedings against them. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 341 , 506 r/w 34 of the IPC and Sections 3 (1)(r), 3(1)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act .

2. The prosecution case as revealed from the FIR is that the accused persons, who are not members of the scheduled caste or scheduled tribe community, with the intention to insult the defacto complainant, who is a member of schedule caste community, called her by her caste name on 07.10.2020 at about 9.00 a.m., wrongfully restrained her while she was bringing quarry waste in a lorry, abused her in filthy words, intimidated to do away with her and thereby they are alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.

3. When this matter came up for arguments, there was no representation for the petitioner. The petition was opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. On a perusal of the FI statement, it can be seen that there are specific allegations against the petitioner to the effect that he wrongfully restrained the defacto complainant, abused her in filthy words by calling the name of her caste and intimidated her. Thus prima facie, the offences alleged by the prosecution are made out. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner is liable to be rejected.

In the result, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top