Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
RAJAGOPALAN,(DIED) (LHR RECORDED) – Appellant
Versus
GANGADHARAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. party ownership and historical transfer of property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding title and evidence standards. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence regarding property ownership. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. conclusion reversing previous court orders. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
The defendant in a suit for injunction has come up in this present appeal aggrieved by the concurrent findings rendered against her.
2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:
The plaint schedule property originally belonged to Oriyam Madam Mana from where the mother of the 1st defendant Kunjhukutty Amma obtained the same by virtue of document No.744 of 1966 of the Sub Registrar Office, Trithala. The extent of property, which is purchased by the Kunjhukutty Amma, is 40.46 Ares in Survey Nos.311/1A and 1B-4 of Trithala Mezhathur Amsom. Later, Kunjhukutty Amma assigned the aforesaid property to the State of Kerala under document No.2448/87 of S.R.O., Trithala. It appears that in the year 1991 as per document No.1722 of 1991 dated
22.06.1991 said Kunjhukutty Amma tracing her title to document No.744/66 transferred an extent of 3.6 Ares in Survey Nos.311/1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
