Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14913

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
R. SURESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12508 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GOPAKUMAR R.THALIYAL, SHRI.T.S.RAJASENAN, SRI.R.B.BALACHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SHRI.ARUN V.G., SMT.V.JAYA RAGI, SHRI.R.HARIKRISHNAN, SRI.NEERAJ NARAYAN SYLAJA S.L.

A writ petition can be dismissed as infructuous if the petitioner indicates that the matter is no longer relevant.

Headnote:This judgment addresses the dismissal of WP

(C) NO. 12508 OF 2023 after the petitioner conveyed that the matter had become infructuous. The court recognized this submission and determined that the writ petition should be dismissed on this basis. Therefore, the final ruling is the dismissal of the petition.

JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Recording the above submission, this writ petition would stand dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14913

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JR. SURESH – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 12508 OF 2023

A writ petition can be dismissed as infructuous if the petitioner indicates that the matter is no longer relevant.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
R. SURESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12508 OF 2023