Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14917

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
MOHAMMED HASHIM – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 23487 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.J.G.SYAMNATH, SRI.I.ARIF MUHAMMAD
For the Respondents: SRI.M.R.SARIN, SRI.N.B.SUNIL NATH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Failure to represent in a writ petition leads to dismissal for non-prosecution.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to WP

(C) NO. 23487 OF 2023, where the petitioners failed to appear, leading to the dismissal for non-prosecution. The court emphasized the necessity of representation in civil writs. The outcome reflects a ruling dismissing the case for lack of prosecution.

J U D G M E N T

There is no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 14917

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JMOHAMMED HASHIM – AppellantVersusTHE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE – RespondentWP(C) NO. 23487 OF 2023

Failure to represent in a writ petition leads to dismissal for non-prosecution.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to WP(C) NO. 23487 OF 2023, where the petitioners failed to appear, leading to the dismissal for non-prosecution. The court emphasized the necessity of representation in civil writs. The outcome reflects a ruling dismissing the case for lack of prosecution.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
MOHAMMED HASHIM – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 23487 OF 2023

Headnote:This judgment pertains to WP

(C) NO. 23487 OF 2023, where the petitioners failed to appear, leading to the dismissal for non-prosecution. The court emphasized the necessity of representation in civil writs. The outcome reflects a ruling dismissing the case for lack of prosecution.