Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
S. Santhosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to tribunal's order regarding pay revisions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. original petition dismissed. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments on eligibility for higher grade benefits. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. high court's supervisory jurisdiction under article 227. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. tribunal's compliance with legal principles, no errors found. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The petitioners who are the applicants 1, 2, 5 to 7, 10, 11, 15 to 17, 20 to 27 and 29 in O.A.No.768 of 2021 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ for short) filed this original petition invoking supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 11.02.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. Going by the averments in the original application, out of the 30 applicants in the original application, Serial Nos. 1 to 25 are working in the Scheduled Tribes Development Department as Tribal Development Officers, Assistant Tribal Development Officers, Special Extension Officers and Senior Superintendents, etc and serial numbers 26 to 30 are retired employees of the Scheduled Tri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
