Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
SURESH BABU P – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Please provide the content of the legal document (to be inserted as {content} within
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to no objection certificate (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of the case and parties involved (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. dismissal of the writ petition by the learned single judge (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments raised by the appellant (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. respondent's position and counterarguments (Para 12 , 18 , 22) |
| 6. analysis of relevant laws and regulations (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 20) |
| 7. discussion of locus standi (Para 16 , 17 , 19) |
| 8. clarification on the requirements for noc (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
This writ appeal is filed under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 , by the petitioner in W.P.(C)No.15700 of 2025, challenging the judgment dated 29.01.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in that writ petition.
2. The appellant filed W.P.(C)No.15700 of 2025 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:
“a. Call for the records leading to the passing of Ext.P11 No Objection Certificate and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order.
b. To declare that the 4th respondent does not have the competency to apply for No Objection Certificate under Rule 144 of the Petroleum
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
