IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SAJINSHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the accusations and nature of crimes. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the counsel regarding bail. (Para 5) |
| 3. court's rationale for denying bail due to prior violations. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, BNSS ) seeking regular bail.
2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.1143/2025 of Vattappara Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 79 , 296(b), 324(3), 329(4), 333 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that due to the prior animosity, the applicant trespassed into the house of the de facto complainant on 03.12.2025 at about 10.15 p.m., intimidated the de facto complainant by uttering abusive words, threatened to kill the son of the defacto complainant by exhibiting a knife, broke the lock of the gate of the defacto complainant and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.
4. I have heard Sri. Latheesh Sebastian, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt. Sreeja.V, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.
5. The learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.