IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
SHOBBY JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
D.CHANDRAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against accused of forgery and related offenses. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion of implications of the magistrate's decision. (Para 4) |
| 3. the necessity of providing reasoned judgment based on evidence. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
The order dated 20.07.2019 of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-V, Thiruvananthapuram, dismissing a petition filed for discharge by the accused in C.C.No.129/2013 on the files of that Court, is under challenge in this revision petition filed by the accused Nos.1 & 2 in that case. 2. The learned Magistrate initiated the proceedings upon a private complaint filed by the first respondent. The allegation against the petitioners is that they forged a power of attorney purportedly executed by the brother of the second petitioner, and made use of the same for seeking reliefs in a suit instituted before the Munsiff’s Court, Thiruvananthapuram, as O.S.No.561/2010, and also in a proceedings before the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, Thiruvananthapuram. Thus, the petitioners are alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 468 , 471 & 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 .
3. In the proceedings under Sec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.