IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
PRADEEP PALANI – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. property acquisition and application for benefits under conservation act. (Para 1) |
| 2. hearing of the petitioner's claims and proceedings. (Para 2) |
| 3. court permits filing under prescribed form and directs timely processing. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner and his wife are stated to have purchased 4.76 Ares of property in Sy Nos.7/10-16, 7/10-17, 7/9-14 and 7/9-15 of Mavelikkara Village, along with an old residential building. Since the nature of the property was described as paddy land, the petitioner filed an appropriate application seeking the benefits under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 . The Revenue Divisional Officer has passed Ext.P6 order. While passing Ext.P6 order, the claim of the petitioner with respect to properties in Sy.Nos.7/9-14 and 7/9-15 having an extent of 1.20 and 1.03 Ares respectively were accepted. The prayer with respect to properties in Sy.Nos.7-10-16 and 7/10-17, having an extent of 1.25 and 1.28 Ares respectively, were rejected. The reason stated for the rejection as above is that those properties are included in the data bank. It is seeking to challenge Ext.P6 that the petitioner approached
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.