Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
AJITH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner involved in vehicle accident. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner seeks to pay amount in installments. (Para 2) |
| 3. court allows installment based payments under condition. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the owner of a vehicle which involved in an accident leading to the Award in OP(MV) No.1152/2018 of the MACT, Mavelikkara filed by the victim/claimant. The 4th respondent Insurance Company was directed to satisfy the Award at the first instance and to recover the same from the petitioner, as there was violation of the policy condition. The petitioner has been issued with Exts.P1 and P2 demand notices respectively under Sections 7 and 34 of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act , 1968.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will pay the amount demanded in Exts.P1 and P2 in ten equal monthly installments.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader and the learned Standing Counsel for the Insurance Company.
4. It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the Insurance Company that the amount due to the claimant has already been satisfied by the Insurance Company. It is further submitted that they
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
