SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15235

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
AJITH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 9335 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN, K.U VYKHARI, K.U SHRI.RAJESH PULIYANETHU
For the Respondents: SRI.P.S. APPU, SR.ADV.SRI. GEORGE A CHERIYAN

A party's right to pay installments for dues demanded under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act is recognized, contingent upon compliance with set payment conditions.

Headnote:In this case, the petitioner, owner of a vehicle involved in an accident that led to a compensation award against him, seeks relief under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, 1968. The court finds that the Insurance Company has satisfied the award but agrees to allow the petitioner to pay via installments due to his financial constraints. The main issue framed by the court revolves around the right for installment payments imposed by the Revenue Recovery notices. The court concludes directing the petitioner to remit the demanded amounts in ten installments starting from 01.04.2026. If there’s a default, recovery proceedings by the relevant authorities can ensue.

Table of Content
1. petitioner involved in vehicle accident. (Para 1)
2. petitioner seeks to pay amount in installments. (Para 2)
3. court allows installment based payments under condition. (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the owner of a vehicle which involved in an accident leading to the Award in OP(MV) No.1152/2018 of the MACT, Mavelikkara filed by the victim/claimant. The 4th respondent Insurance Company was directed to satisfy the Award at the first instance and to recover the same from the petitioner, as there was violation of the policy condition. The petitioner has been issued with Exts.P1 and P2 demand notices respectively under Sections 7 and 34 of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act , 1968.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will pay the amount demanded in Exts.P1 and P2 in ten equal monthly installments.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader and the learned Standing Counsel for the Insurance Company.

4. It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the Insurance Company that the amount due to the claimant has already been satisfied by the Insurance Company. It is further submitted that they have no objection in the petitioner remitting the amount demanded in Exts.P1 and P2 in installments.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to remit the amount demanded in Exts.P1 and P2 in ten equal monthly installments along with statutory charges, commencing from 01.04.2026. In case the petitioner defaults payment of any of the installments as aforesaid, it will be open to the 2nd and 3rd respondents to proceed with the revenue recovery proceedings.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top