SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15353

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
ABdurahiman – Appellant
Versus
Iravuchira E.A.Jacob – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri.K.M.Firoz, Smt.M.Shajna, Shri.E.C.Ahamed Fazil, Sri.P.C.Muhammed Noushiq
For the Respondents: Shri.George Mathews, Sri.Pranoy K.Kottaram

Sathish Ninan, J.

The parties have settled their disputes in mediation. They have entered into a memorandum of agreement incorporating the terms of settlement. This appeal is disposed of in terms of the settlement. The memorandum of agreement will form part of this judgment. The court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal shall be refunded to the appellant.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top