SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15356

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
TOM J KALLARACKAL – Appellant
Versus
NAVIN V – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.PRAVEEN.H, SMT.K.S.SMITHA, SMT.E.SILPA, SHRI.AMAL DEV D, SHRI.VEDHAS K., SHRI.NITHIN POULOSE, SHRI.GOKUL CHANDRA
For the Respondents: Not listed

Sathish Ninan, J.

The grievance of the appellants is that, in spite having filed an application under Article 226 (3) of the Constitution, the learned Single Judge has extended the interim order granted on 25/11/2025 for a further period of three months, without considering the application.

2. The application is numbered as I.A.No.1 of 2026.

We are sure that, if the filing of the above application is brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge, appropriate orders would be passed taking note of the same.

No directions are called for in this appeal. The appeal is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top