Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
ADOLF LOPEZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application to quash proceedings under ipc and kp act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. insufficient evidence for charges; need for sanction under kp act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
ORDER
(Order dated 9th March, 2026)
The sole accused in CC No.1159/2021 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrates Court, Thiruvananthapuram arising out of Crime No.2151 of 2019 of the Medical College Police Station, filed this Crl.MC under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioner.
2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 294 (b) and 506(1) of the IPC and Section 120 (o) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011 . The Prosecution case is that on 09.09.2019 at about 2.20 pm, the accused called the defacto complainant over mobile phone and abused her in filthy words. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, even if the entire allegations levelled against the petitioner are believed as such, the same does not constitute the offences punishable under Section 294 (b) as well as under Section 506 (i) of the . Further according to the learned counsel, the remaining offence being under (o) of the KP Act is non-cog
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
