IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
PANCHALI, DHANA P.D – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. sureties challenge bond forfeiture (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel arguments presented (Para 3) |
| 3. court observations on due process (Para 4) |
| 4. ruling on quashing notices (Para 5) |
ORDER
The petitioners are the sureties of the counter petitioner in M.C.No.216/2023 on the file of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Irinjalakuda, which was initiated against the counter petitioner under Section 110 (e) of the Code of Criminal Procedure .
2. The petitioners have stated in the criminal miscellaneous case that they had stood as sureties for the counter petitioner in the above case. The counter petitioner was present before the above Court on 27.11.2024 and sought for time to file his explanation to the report filed by the Police. But, the above Court compelled the counter petitioner to execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- with two solvent sureties. Subsequently, the Station House Officer, Kaipamangalam filed a report stating that the counter petitioner has violated the bond conditions by getting himself involved in a subsequent crime. Immediately, the above Court issued notice to the petitioners directing them to appear on 17.09.2025 and show cause why the bond executed by them should not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.