Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15492
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
N.K KURIKOSE – Appellant
Versus
VENGOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 29109 OF 2023
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.BINU PAUL
For the Respondents: SHRI.N.RAJESH
The court recognized the resolution of a property dispute through compliance with removal requests while preserving the petitioner's right for future recourse.
Headnote:The petitioner seeks removal of trees causing danger to life and property, with the 1st respondent acknowledging removal. The court records the respondent's submission, noting the dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, while leaving the option for the petitioner to approach again if necessary. The petition is therefore closed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks tree removal due to safety concerns. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondent confirms compliance with removal request. (Para 2) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to cut and remove the trees belonging to the 3rd respondent, which were allegedly causing danger to the petitioner's life and property.
2. Sri. N. Rajesh, the learned counsel for the Panchayat, on the basis of the instructions received, would point out that the trees in the property of the 3rd respondent have already been cut and removed.
In view of the aforesaid submission, especially since the dispute is between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, who are stated to be brothers, the writ petition stands closed, recording the submission made as above by the learned counsel for the Panchayat. However, the right of the petitioner to approach this Court again is left open, if necessity arises.
Sd/-
