SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15523

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
SUJESH – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY KOTTAYAM – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 7156 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RILGIN V.GEORGE, SHRI.K.T.RAVEENDRAN, SHRI.DENNISE JACOB SAVY, SMT.FAZNA RAFI A. R.

The decision underscores the necessity of adhering to procedural fairness in administrative actions regarding permit renewals.

Headnote:The writ petition challenges the refusal to renew a stage carriage permit, invoking procedural fairness as articulated under the relevant statutes. The Court directed the consideration of the application for a temporary permit without being influenced by prior orders, emphasizing the importance of due process in administrative decisions. Ultimately, the petition was ruled upon allowing the direction for fair consideration of the application within two weeks from the receipt of the judgment.

Table of Content
1. holder of permit challenges renewal refusal. (Para 1)
2. court directs consideration of application. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the holder of a regular stage carriage permit on the route Maniyamparambu – Kottayam in respect of the vehicle bearing registration No.KL-05-Y-5247. Against the refusal of renewal of permit by the RTA, the petitioner preferred appeal before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal and the Tribunal, dismissed the appeal by Ext.P6 as not maintainable since the final decision on Ext.P5 proceedings of the Regional Transport Authority was pending. Ext.P7 is the application for renewal of permit filed in terms of Ext.P5 decision.

2. The learned counsel on both sides submits that final proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 has been issued as per G.O(P) No.8/2026/Trans. dated 01.03.2026 and there is an approved scheme in respect of Kottayam – Neendoor via Medical College, published by notification SRO No.282/2026 dated 01.03.2026.

3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

2nd respondent to consider Ext.P7 application for temporary permit in the light of the SRO referred to above and untrammeled by Ext.P6 order and after hearing the 3rd respondent or any other affected parties. Orders as above shall be passed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top