Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
NIKITHA E – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek additional posts for staffing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court observes impact of earlier judgments. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court mandates timely decision before the upcoming academic year. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT Dated this the 9th day of March, 2026 The petitioners are UPSTs working under the
5th respondent’s School. Petitioners 1 and 2 were working as UPST and they were appointed in the year 2023-2024. The 4th petitioner was appointed as UPST with effect from 03.06.2024 in additional division vacancies.
2. The petitioners state that new accommodation was proposed and a provisional Occupancy Certificate was issued by the Panchayat since the category of land was Nilam at that point of time. Provisional Fitness Certificate was issued for the year 2023-2024 and 2024-2025. The Assistant Educational Officer denied recommendations for additional eight posts during the year 2023-2024 and nine posts in the year 2024-2025.
3. The petitioners would urge that the School is entitled for additional posts. The 4th respondent rejected the proposal stating that the posts were not sanctioned and that 1:1 ratio was not complied with. The petitioners would urge that both the reasons
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
