Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15661
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
ANITHA VAS – Appellant
Versus
PRASANNA KUMARI.P.O. – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 288 OF 2026
Important Points
The petition became moot after the petitioners received the order copy they initially claimed not to have received.
Subject
Civil - Civil Procedure
Headnote
This Court examined the petitioners' claims regarding not receiving a copy of an order dated 27.01.2026, impeding their ability to appeal. The Court acknowledged that the petitioners subsequently received the copy, thereby rendering the petition moot. The Court ordered the matter closed without prejudice to the petitioners' claims.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.SANEESH KUMAR, SMT.V.B.SANTHINI
For the Respondents: SRI.LEKSHMY NARAYAN(SR.), SMT.R.RANJANIE, SHRI.NEVIL ZACHARIA MATHEW, SMT.HYRUNNISA T.H., SHRI.RAJAKUMAR N.
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.SANEESH KUMAR, SMT.V.B.SANTHINI
For the Respondents: SRI.LEKSHMY NARAYAN(SR.), SMT.R.RANJANIE, SHRI.NEVIL ZACHARIA MATHEW, SMT.HYRUNNISA T.H., SHRI.RAJAKUMAR N.
JUDGMENT
The petitioners have approached this Court stating that they have not yet been issued with copy of order dated 27.01.2026 (Ext.P5) to facilitate them to challenge the same and coercive steps were being taken. Pending this original petition, copy has already been issued to the petitioners.
In the above circumstances, this original petition has become infructuous and is closed without prejudice to the contentions.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI JUDGE
