Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15661

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
ANITHA VAS – Appellant
Versus
PRASANNA KUMARI.P.O. – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 288 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.SANEESH KUMAR, SMT.V.B.SANTHINI
For the Respondents: SRI.LEKSHMY NARAYAN(SR.), SMT.R.RANJANIE, SHRI.NEVIL ZACHARIA MATHEW, SMT.HYRUNNISA T.H., SHRI.RAJAKUMAR N.

The petition became moot after the petitioners received the order copy they initially claimed not to have received.

Headnote:This Court examined the petitioners' claims regarding not receiving a copy of an order dated 27.01.2026, impeding their ability to appeal. The Court acknowledged that the petitioners subsequently received the copy, thereby rendering the petition moot. The Court ordered the matter closed without prejudice to the petitioners' claims.

JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached this Court stating that they have not yet been issued with copy of order dated 27.01.2026 (Ext.P5) to facilitate them to challenge the same and coercive steps were being taken. Pending this original petition, copy has already been issued to the petitioners.

In the above circumstances, this original petition has become infructuous and is closed without prejudice to the contentions.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15661

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMT.R.RAVI, JANITHA VAS – AppellantVersusPRASANNA KUMARI.P.O. – RespondentOP(C) NO. 288 OF 2026

The petition became moot after the petitioners received the order copy they initially claimed not to have received.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
ANITHA VAS – Appellant
Versus
PRASANNA KUMARI.P.O. – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 288 OF 2026