SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15673

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SHANOJ K.G., RAJEENA P.K. – Appellant
Versus
BEENA VARGHESE, S.M.PRAMOD, DR.ANJU S.R, DR.SARITHA BINOY – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 578 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.21204 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ, KUM.THULASI K. RAJ, SMT.CHINNU MARIA ANTONY, SMT.APARNA NARAYAN MENON
For the Respondents: SRI.S.M.PRASANTH, SRI.J.RAMKUMAR, SHRI.SHERRY M.V.

Withdrawal of contempt proceedings is permissible upon the petitioner's request.

Headnote:The court analyzed the provisions relating to contempt of court, noting that the petitioners wished to withdraw their contempt case. The court found that withdrawal was appropriate under the circumstances. The essential question framed was whether the case should proceed or be withdrawn. The court reasoned that since the petitioners seek dismissal, it is dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to their request on 9th March 2026.

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the contempt of court case.

Accordingly the above contempt of court case is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top