Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15673
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SHANOJ K.G., RAJEENA P.K. – Appellant
Versus
BEENA VARGHESE, S.M.PRAMOD, DR.ANJU S.R, DR.SARITHA BINOY – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 578 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.21204 OF 2022
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ, KUM.THULASI K. RAJ, SMT.CHINNU MARIA ANTONY, SMT.APARNA NARAYAN MENON
For the Respondents: SRI.S.M.PRASANTH, SRI.J.RAMKUMAR, SHRI.SHERRY M.V.
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ, KUM.THULASI K. RAJ, SMT.CHINNU MARIA ANTONY, SMT.APARNA NARAYAN MENON
For the Respondents: SRI.S.M.PRASANTH, SRI.J.RAMKUMAR, SHRI.SHERRY M.V.
Withdrawal of contempt proceedings is permissible upon the petitioner's request.
Headnote:The court analyzed the provisions relating to contempt of court, noting that the petitioners wished to withdraw their contempt case. The court found that withdrawal was appropriate under the circumstances. The essential question framed was whether the case should proceed or be withdrawn. The court reasoned that since the petitioners seek dismissal, it is dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to their request on 9th March 2026.
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the contempt of court case.
Accordingly the above contempt of court case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
