IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
\+?>S0+47]+"?23+921 8 – Appellant
Versus
Babu.B.K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to tribunal order on training period benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on finality of prior judgments. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. limits of article 227 supervisory jurisdiction. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 13) |
| 4. no interference; petition dismissed. (Para 14 , 15) |
The respondents in O.A.No.1522 of 2024 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ for short), filed this original petition, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging Ext.P3 order dated 30.01.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that original application.
2. The respondents-applicants filed O.A.No.1522 of 2024 before the Tribunal, invoking the provisions under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeking the following reliefs;
“i. To issue appropriate direction or orders setting aside Annexure A3, A4, A5, A7, A9, A10, A15, A16 and A18 orders.
ii. To issue appropriate direction or orders directing the respondents to pay an amount of Rs.2,59,849/- to the 1st applicant and Rs.2,22,985/- to the 2nd applicant, and Rs.2,19,220/- to the 3rd applicant with interest @ 12% from the respective d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.