SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15806

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
AKHIL KRISHNAN S.J – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6959 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.B.SABITHA
For the Respondents: SRI.SAIJO HASSAN, SMT.SREENA B.S., SHRI.GOVIND SANTHOSH, SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN, SRI.A.G.GIRISH KUMAR, SRI.G.KANNAN, SRI.ABRAHAM J. KANIYAMPADY, SRI.SANGEETH MOHAN, SMT.V.P.REJITHA, SRI.BAPPU GALIB SALAM, SRI.SREYAS SREEKUMAR, SRI.SREEJITH V.S.

Withdrawal of writ petition granted, with liberty for future proceedings based on emerging circumstances.

Headnote:The court analyzed the petitioner’s request to withdraw the writ petition due to a settlement between parties, referring to the procedural norms. The court granted the petitioner liberty to initiate further proceedings should circumstances warrant. The determination upheld procedural respect while dismissing the application as withdrawn.

Result: This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings, if circumstances so warrant.

Reserving the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top