Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SUDHARSAN B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim of lack of culpability not sufficiently supported. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. prosecution's account includes multiple similar accusations. (Para 4) |
| 3. opposition strongly supports the continuation of accusations. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court emphasizes adherence to legal provisions for quashing. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
C.S.DIAS,J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Crl. M.C.No. 11511 of 2025 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 5th day of March, 2026
O R D E R
The petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No.793 of 2022 registered by the Guruvayoor Police Station, Thrissur, alleging that the accused persons in the above crime have committed the offences punishable under Sections 406 and
420 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioner has filed this Criminal Miscellaneous Case to quash Annexure A1 FIR and all further proceedings in the above crime on the assertion that, even if the allegations in the FIR are taken on their face value, the same would not attract the offences alleged against the petitioner. In fact, the petitioner is only an I.T. professional, who has been rendering services to the accused in the cri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
