SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
JASMINE – Appellant
Versus
JOY. K.V. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN, SRI.V.SREEJITH, SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE
For the Respondents: SHRI.A.DINESH RAO, SMT.LEVYANN XAVIER

JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.

When this matter was called today, the learned counsel on both sides were ad idem that all disputes between their respective clients have been settled through mediation.

2. We notice that a Memorandum of Settlement under Section

89 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been filed, along with the report of the learned Mediator; in which, the appellants have offered to withdraw this Appeal and their learned counsel conceded before us that all terms of the compromise have already been complied with by the parties.

In the afore circumstances, this Appeal is dismissed as having been withdrawn, based on the compromise between the parties.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top