JASMINE vs JOY. K.V. - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15885

Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15885

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
JASMINE – Appellant
Versus
JOY. K.V. – Respondent
MAT.APPEAL NO. 759 OF 2020 | OP NO.658 OF 2015

Important Points

Court recognizes settlement through mediation, allowing withdrawal of appeal when terms are complied with.

Subject

Family Law - Matrimonial Appeal

Act Referred

Code of Civil Procedure: S.89

Headnote

Under Section 89 of the CPC, a Memorandum of Settlement has been filed, confirming the settlement of disputes between the parties. The appellants agreed to withdraw their appeal, with their attorney affirming that the terms of the agreement have been fulfilled. Thus, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn due to the compromise.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN, SRI.V.SREEJITH, SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE
For the Respondents: SHRI.A.DINESH RAO, SMT.LEVYANN XAVIER

JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.

When this matter was called today, the learned counsel on both sides were ad idem that all disputes between their respective clients have been settled through mediation.

2. We notice that a Memorandum of Settlement under Section

89 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been filed, along with the report of the learned Mediator; in which, the appellants have offered to withdraw this Appeal and their learned counsel conceded before us that all terms of the compromise have already been complied with by the parties.

In the afore circumstances, this Appeal is dismissed as having been withdrawn, based on the compromise between the parties.

Sd/-