Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15895

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
KOTTATHODI THANKAM – Appellant
Versus
PARAPPURATH SANDHYA – Respondent
EX.SA NO. 2 OF 2016

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI, SRI.V.A.SATHEESH
For the Respondents: SMT.KAVERY S THAMPI, SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON

An appeal may be dismissed as infructuous if it no longer presents a live issue for determination.

Headnote:This judgment concerns Ex.S.A. No. 2 of 2016, arising from a decree dated 10.07.2015, in Additional District Court I, Kozhikode. The core issue pertains to the appeal becoming infructuous, leading to a dismissal based on the appellant's submission. The court reaffirms the procedural aspects of handling infructuous appeals while upholding judicial principles of efficiency and closure in litigation. The final ruling was to dismiss the appeal as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the appeal has become infructuous.

Recording the aforesaid submission, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

EASWARAN S.

JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15895

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMEASWARAN S., JKOTTATHODI THANKAM – AppellantVersusPARAPPURATH SANDHYA – RespondentEX.SA NO. 2 OF 2016

An appeal may be dismissed as infructuous if it no longer presents a live issue for determination.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
KOTTATHODI THANKAM – Appellant
Versus
PARAPPURATH SANDHYA – Respondent
EX.SA NO. 2 OF 2016