SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 15952

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
BALATHILAKAN – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGER, THE PANTHEERANKAVU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
RP NO. 1366 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.45403 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
For the Respondents: R SUDHISH

The court dismissed the review petition due to a lack of pressing arguments from the petitioner.

Headnote:The Review Petition under RP No.1366 of 2025 sought to reconsider the earlier judgment in WP

(C) No.45403 of 2024. The court found that the petitioner, represented by counsel, was not pressing the Review Petition, leading to its dismissal. The issues before the court focused on the petitioner's intentions regarding the review. The court's determination was based on the absence of pressing arguments from the petitioner. The final ruling stated, 'The Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed.'

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not pressing the Review Petition. The Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top