JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :

i) “Issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order to call for the records and to quash Ext.P7 order;

ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction commanding the 1^st Respondent to consider and pass orders on the Exhibit-P2 Application dated 7-07-2024, on its merits and in accordance with law, after affording the Petitioner an opportunity of being heard, within the time frame to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court;

iii) Grant such other reliefs as are deemed just and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [sic]

2. A confirmation order is passed as evident by Ext.P7 to remove a LED hoarding. The grievance of the petitioner is that the same is passed without giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner submitted Ext.P8. The same is also not considered is the grievance.

3. This Court considered the contentions of the petitioner and the Standing Counsel appearing for the 1^st respondent.