SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16095

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ABHINAND K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2304 OF 2026 | LP NO.3 OF 2022 | ST NO.275 OF 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ANTONY THOMAS, SHRI.GEEVAN T.CHARLES, SMT.SUNI KARUNAKARAN
For the Respondents: SR.PP.SMT. SEETHA S.

The court underscores the importance of allowing an accused to surrender and apply for bail while ensuring the law is faithfully followed in such processes.

Headnote:This case examines the petitioner's application for bail in relation to S.T. No. 275/2017 concerning the allegation of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The petitioner, unable to appear in the Trial Court due to unavoidable circumstances, seeks redress as steps under the Code of Criminal Procedure initiated against him. The Court permits the petitioner to surrender within ten days and file appropriate bail applications, directing the Trial Court to consider these applications promptly. The findings reiterate the rights of the accused to seek bail, ensuring adherence to legal provisions in such matters.

Table of Content
1. accused's application for bail and guidelines for surrender (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's response to petitioner and concerns regarding custody (Para 3)
3. court's directive for the trial court regarding bail applications (Para 4)

Dated this the 12th day of March, 2026 ORDER The petitioner is the accused in S.T. No.275/2017 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Kodungallur (Trial Court), which has been filed by the 2nd respondent alleging the commission of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments, Act, 1881.

2. The petitioner has stated in the Criminal Miscellaneous Case that, due to unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not appear before the Trial Court. The petitioner has reliably learnt that the case against him has been transferred to the Long Pending Register, steps under Sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been initiated and a non-bailable warrant has been issued against him. The petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the Trial Court and get himself enlarged on bail. However, the petitioner is apprehensive that his applications may not be considered on the date of surrender and he may be remanded to judicial custody. Hence, the Crl.M.C.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor

4. On a consideration of the facts and materials on record, without expressing anything on the merits of the matter, I dispose of the Crl.M.C, by permitting the petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court within ten days from today and file applications before the Trial Court to get himself enlarged on bail, and to recall non- bailable warrant, after serving advance copies on the Public Prosecutor. If such applications are filed within the prescribed time period, the Trial Court is directed to consider and dispose the applications in accordance with law, preferably on the same day the petitioner surrenders before the Trial Court.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top