IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
ANAS. K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner’s fee dispute regarding land construction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. deliberation on judicial precedents and ongoing appeals. (Para 3) |
| 3. directive for processing the application without additional fee. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
i. “Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the Note (1) appended to Fee Schedule of Ext.P12 SRO, by declaring that Rule 12 (9) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Rules , 2008 is ultra vires to the provision of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act , 2008 to the extent it imposes levy of fee @ Rs.100/- per each and every Sq. Ft, exceeding the floor area of 3000 Sq. Ft.
ii. Declare that being the owner of unnotified land covered by Ext.P9 application, the petitioner is not liable to pay the additional amount remarked as per Ext. P6 Order as fee for the buildings proposed to be constructed on the land, the nature of which is sought to be changed, and to quash Ext.P6 Order to the extent it imposing an additional fee of Rs. 100 per square feet for any building proposed to be constructed exceeding 3000 Sq Ft., by i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.