Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SINDHU JAYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the criminal revision petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against the earlier orders. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the cognizance order. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. ratio and legal principles regarding cognizance. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. final decision on remand. (Para 12) |
ORDER
Dated this the 06th day of March, 2026 The 1st accused in C.C. No. 929 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Taliparamba, arising out of a private complaint, filed this Crl.Rev.Pet., being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Magistrate taking cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 341, 323, 452, 354, 354A and 506(I)
r/w Section 149 of the IPC .
2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the 2nd respondent/defacto complainant originally filed a private complaint, which was sent to the SHO under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C for registration of the crime and investigation. Accordingly, the police registered Crime No. 1054 of 2018 of Taliparamba police station. After investigation, the police filed a refer report. Aggrieved by the said refer report, he preferred a protest complaint in which the learned Magistr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
