Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
STAR OF ASIA STADIUM COMPLEX REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.A.MOHAMMED HAJI – Appellant
Versus
1 ISMAIL T. – Respondent
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this revision petition need not be continued since the de facto complainant, who filed the petition, is not interested in proceeding with the matter. It is further submitted that a memo to the effect that the revision petition is not pressed, has been filed.
In the light of the above submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the revision petition stands closed.
Sd/-
G.GIRISH JUDGE IAP APPENDIX OF CRL.RP NO.1600 OF 2008 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES:
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
