Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16305
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
STAR OF ASIA STADIUM COMPLEX REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.A.MOHAMMED HAJI – Appellant
Versus
1 ISMAIL T. – Respondent
CRL.REV.PET NO. 1600 OF 2008
Important Points
Subject
Criminal Law - Revision Petition
Headnote
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.RAJESH SUKUMARAN
For the Respondents: V.PREMCHAND, ANIMA M
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this revision petition need not be continued since the de facto complainant, who filed the petition, is not interested in proceeding with the matter. It is further submitted that a memo to the effect that the revision petition is not pressed, has been filed.
In the light of the above submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the revision petition stands closed.
Sd/-
G.GIRISH JUDGE IAP APPENDIX OF CRL.RP NO.1600 OF 2008 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES:
