SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. GOPINATH P., J
M/S. P V S HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43571 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN, SRI.T.R.TARIN
For the Respondents: ADV SHRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL, SMT. RESMI THOMAS

Recovery proceedings cannot proceed if an appeal and stay application are pending before a tribunal.

Headnote:This judgment addresses the issue of recovery proceedings initiated against a petitioner under Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 during the pendency of an appeal and stay application before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal. The Court ruled that recovery proceedings should be held in abeyance pending consideration of the stay petition due to the ongoing absence of tribunal sittings. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed with directions for adherence to existing legal processes.

JUDGMENT The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that the recovery proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner for recovery of amounts due under Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (in short ‘the 1952 Act’) for a period from 09/2020 to 05/2023 at a time when an appeal is pending before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal along with an application for stay. It is the case of the petitioner that pending consideration of the appeal and the stay petition, the Provident Fund Department ought not to have proceeded for recovery.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Provident Fund Department also.

3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the Provident Fund Department, I am of the view that since it is admitted that an appeal has been filed by the petitioner before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal along with an application for stay, the proceedings for recovery initiated to recover the amounts adjudicated as damages under Section 14B of the 1952 Act for the period from 09/2020 to

05/2023 shall be kept in abeyance till the stay petition filed by the petitioner before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal against the order imposing damages is taken up and considered by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal. I am inclined to direct as above taking into consideration the fact that there has been no sitting at the Central Government Industrial Tribunal for sometime and the petitioner has not been able to bring up the stay petition for consideration.

The writ petition will stand disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top