Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
AJAYAGHOSH D., ANOOP KUMAR, G.BINU, S.RAJESH, R.GOPAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE LABOUR COURT, T.D.NAGAR, VIDYA NAGAR, KOLLAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners are workmen alleging denied employment. (Para 1) |
| 2. court heard petitioners' counsel regarding service issues. (Para 2) |
| 3. court emphasized need for legal procedures and principles. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners are stated to be workmen under the 2nd and 3rd respondent herein. They allege that they have been denied employment, on account of which the 4th respondent Union raised an Industrial Dispute which was referred to the Labour Court, Kollam. The 1st respondent, Labour Court, having passed Ext.P1 award, deciding the issue against the petitioners, they have instituted the captioned writ petition. 2. I have heard Smt. A.K. Preetha, the learned Counsel for the petitioners. In spite of service of notice, 3rd respondent is not represented.
3. The 2nd respondent in the writ petition has since been deleted from the party array, since an attempt to serve notice on the said respondent failed. However, the 3rd respondent, who is the Managing Partner of the firm in which the petitioners were stated to have been working, is in the party array. The petitioners contend that they were denied employment with effect form 16.09.2015. However, the Labour Court i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
