Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
SARFUNNISA, LAILA – Appellant
Versus
HAFSA, SALEENA, ANWARUDHEEN, SIRAJUDHEEN, YASAR, MUMTHAS, BAJEENA, NOUSHAD, SAVAD, SHANIMOL, FARSEENA, UMMERYA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPECIAL TAHASILDAR, PROJECT DIRECTOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. need for joint trial on pending land acquisition references. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for simultaneous adjudication in interests of justice. (Para 4 , 5) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.8/2024 on the files of the Sub Court, Manjeri. The suit is filed for partition.
2. Ext.P1 is the copy of the plaint. It is stated that land acquisition reference as regards a portion of the properties scheduled in Ext.P1 is pending before the Additional District Court, Manjeri in LAR Nos.14, 15, 19, 21, 22, 25 and 47 of 2024. At the instance of the petitioner, O.S.No.8/2024 was transferred to the Additional District Court, Manjeri as per the directions of this Court in Ext.P2 judgment so as to have a joint trial and the case was renumbered as O.S.No.3/2025. It is submitted by the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 12 that joint trial has already been ordered in LAR Nos. 21 and 22 of 2024.
3. While so, this Court by Ext.P6 judgment dated
17/10/2025 in OP(C) No.2345/2025 directed early disposal of LAR Nos. 21 and 22 of 2024. On coming to know about Ext.P6, the petitioners preferred I.A.No. 1/2026 (Ext.P7) in LAR Nos.21/2024 for simultaneous disposal of O.S.No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
