Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
RANJINI.K – Appellant
Versus
SUNISH BABU.A – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction for cheque dishonor under ni act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's evaluations of legal representation (Para 3) |
| 3. assessment of factual evidence and sentencing rationale (Para 4) |
| 4. final ruling on penalty and payment timeframe (Para 5) |
ORDER
The concurrent verdicts of the Special Judicial First Class Magistrate Court (NI Act cases), Kozhikode and the Sessions Court, Kozhikode, in CC No.2559/2015 and Crl.Appeal No.306/2017 respectively, convicting and sentencing the petitioner for the commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act , 1881, are under challenge in this revision.
2. The case relates to the dishonour of a cheque dated
05.09.2012 for an amount of Rs.4 lakh, which the petitioner issued to the 1st respondent/complainant. After a detailed evaluation of the evidence adduced by the complainant through the oral testimonies of PW1 and PW2 and the documents marked as Exts.P1 to P5, and also after considering the reply notice marked from the part of the accused as Ext.D1, the learned Magistrate found the petitioner guilty of commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and convicted her thereunder. The petit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
